Thursday 23 May 2013

Week 10 Intercultural Communication


In Australia, there are a lot of people who are from different nations such as Asia and Europe. Each nation has its own culture and customs. Therefore Australia has many multicultural communities in various ways such as university and workplace. It must be very difficult to find a mono-cultural community in this country. For example when I was in Monash University, there is a club called “Japanese Club”, but people who join the club come from different nations. It means that we have to learn Intercultural communication. This post will focus about two examples of my experiences.

Firstly I have realised that communication style is very different between Australia and Japan. Australian people have a tendency to speak out their opinion and ideas much clearer than Japanese people.  For example, if someone says “Yes” in Australia, it means yes. On the other hand it could be no in Japan. Japanese people have to seek the actual meaning from nonverbal expression and social setting. According to Guffey and Loewy (2011), this difference is called low and high context culture. They said that “low context culture tend to be logical, analytical and action oriented”. In the business, people believe that stressing their opinions and ideas is professional and efficient. This is very Australian style culture. However high-context cultures are not straightforward and Japan must have this culture. This is because in Japan, people tend to emphasize interpersonal relationships and nonverbal expression. However when I was working in a big IT firm in Sydney I found it very difficult to understand what Japanese clients actually think about. This might be because I mainly used email to contact my clients and I could not see any nonverbal expression from my clients. Additionally it might be because I had spent more than 5 years of my life in Australia, and I may adopt low context culture already.

Through my work experience, I found that Japanese people tend to focus on small issues. In my workplace, so many Japanese clients asked me about small technical issues which people from other nation would not think about. For example one of the client kept compiling and decompiling the data by using three computers and finally the data does not compile anymore. However I tested many times but I could not find the technical issue and my manager said that no one would do the same thing furthermore one of my colleague got very frustrated.  The way of Japanese people thinking about the technique is the main cause of the conflict. However Japan has created lots of cars and computers, such as Toyota, Mitsubishi, and Toshiba. It may be because Japanese technicians always try to improve their products as much as they can. On the other hand Australia do not have many car or computer company as Japan. It may be because Australian do not focus on techniques as much as Japanese.

Guffey and Loewy (2011) mentioned how Japanese culture is different with Western cultures many time and various ways in the text book.  AS a Japanese person who lives in Australia for a long time, I must have learnt intercultural communication a lot through school and workplace. Two examples that I mentioned are only small parts of my experience.

Guffey, M.E. & Loewy, D (2011) Intercultural Communication. Business Communication Process and Product (7th ed). Mason, USA, South Western Cengage Learning.

Sunday 5 May 2013

Week 8 Blog " An ethical in effective comminication"



Currently, Myer is the largest department chain in Australia. The compant is in a storm of criticism from various Social Medias. This is because Myer’s chief executive Bernie Brookes disagreed with the government plan which is designed to help disabled people. This post will explore an ethical point of view about what Mr Brookes said. I will explore what he should do to show caring attitude towards to disabled people.

Mr Brookes felt disappointed was the federal government plan that aims to increase the Medicare levy by half a percentage point which will cost the average household at least $350 a year. The main intention of the plan was to help disable people financially. Mr Brookes said that the government should not take the money because the shoppers such as tax payers will not use their money at Myer (Robins 2013).  However there are many stores for shoppers to spend their money on and not everyone spend their money at Myer. It means that the plan would not damage Myer’s profit as much as Mr Brookes believes.

Due to the comment, some people think that he does not have any concerns about people with disabilities but his own profit. His self-centred comment was highly unethical. This is because he has excessively emphasized on his profits.(Lehman and DuFrence 2013 p.10). Disabled people are also citizens of Australia as well as customers of Myers.  No one has the right to discriminate people against disabilities including Mr Brookes. That is why the government believes that it is essential to make society where disabled people can live comfortably. To create such an environment, the government needs to take the money from each household. Furthermore his comment might negatively affect his business, because some people may feel that they should not spend their money at Myer due to the comment. In fact, one citizen predicted that Myer will have a very disappointing Mother’s Day Trade this year. Due to his self-centred comment, Mr Brookes needs to consider in form of taking some actions to overcome this storm of criticisms. Otherwise people would think that Myer is a company which only concern about its profit. Disability discrimination commissioner Graeme Innes was furious about Mr Brookes’ comments and demanded Myer to employ 10 per cent more disable people by 2015. (“Myer lashed for CEO’s disability comments”, 2013 para.3). The reason why Mr Innes said such a demanding comment could be because he wants Myers to show that the company cares about disabled people rather than focus on  own profit.

To sum up, it is true that the company needs to increase its profit to keep running the company. However at the same time, it should also care about people especially people with disabilities. They often face many issues in their life such as employments. Disabled people often find it difficult to find a job even if their skills are much better than others. Myer should see their abilities and hire them. Otherwise Myer will get more severe criticisms about the comment. 

Lehman, C.M. & DuFrene, D.D. (2013). Establishing a Framework for Business Communication In BCOM (4th ed) Mason, Canada, Nelson Education, Ltd.

Myer lashed for CEO’s disability comment (2013) Retrieved from    http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2013/05/02/09/52/myer-faces-backlash-over-ndis-comments

Robins, B. (2013) Myer predicts hit from rise to health levy. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/business/myer-predicts-hit-from-rise-to-health-levy-20130501-2itaf.html






Wednesday 27 March 2013

Comparison of two essays

When I read two short essays which have the same topic written by John Doe and Jane Citizen, I strongly think that Jane's essay is better than John's one.
Firstly in John's essay there are a lot of the first person sentences. While I was reading his essay, I felt that I was reading a diary. In fact in his essay he wrote that "I have often travelled long distance because of my work". This passage is not appropriate for the offical essay. And I could not see any the first person in Jane's essay.
Furthermore there are lots of long sentences in John's essay. Some setences could be longer than two lines and these long sentenses could make reader get confused.In Jane's essay, each sentences are no longer than one line and it is much simpler and easier to read.
In addition, I have some questions which resources John got to make a statement. For instance the first sentence of his essay is "Airlines are under pressure these days to make money". I was wondering how does he know that airlines are under pressure and which resource he learnt about it.He needs to put some referencing and he even used wikipedia as his references which is not appropriate and as I skim through the short essay he only used two referencing. On the other hand Jane used some intext referencing with direct or paraphrasing explanations so it is much clear to see how she got the theory from.
Lastly Jane's reference lists are according to APA reference however John's does not. John's lists are really hard to see which resources he used.
From these four resources, it is clear to see that Jane's essay is better than John's one.

First Blog

Hi this is Yuki who studies IT in CSU!